https://dictionary.iucr.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3AReport_of_Working_GroupTalk:Report of Working Group - Revision history2026-06-04T00:38:41ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.30.0https://dictionary.iucr.org/index.php?title=Talk:Report_of_Working_Group&diff=1704&oldid=prevBrianMcMahon: Audience2006-03-13T13:13:58Z<p>Audience</p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr style="vertical-align: top;" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 13:13, 13 March 2006</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>''Brian McMahon'' - In the section on ''Granularity'', I added the sentence "At the time of writing, categories are being assigned to entries on an ''ad hoc'' basis in an attempt to determine suitable structuring mechanisms", which I think fairly reflects where we are on this. Is it mandatory that every entry be assigned to one or more categories? (At the moment I haven't assigned a Category to my entries such as [[CIF]] because it's not clear what would be suitable in these specialised cases.) I observed also John Helliwell's uncertainty over assignement of categories. It may be helpful for Andre to draw up a more extensive list of candidate categories at a quite early stage.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>''Brian McMahon'' - In the section on ''Granularity'', I added the sentence "At the time of writing, categories are being assigned to entries on an ''ad hoc'' basis in an attempt to determine suitable structuring mechanisms", which I think fairly reflects where we are on this. Is it mandatory that every entry be assigned to one or more categories? (At the moment I haven't assigned a Category to my entries such as [[CIF]] because it's not clear what would be suitable in these specialised cases.) I observed also John Helliwell's uncertainty over assignement of categories. It may be helpful for Andre to draw up a more extensive list of candidate categories at a quite early stage.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">== Audience ==</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">''Brian McMahon'' - Here I report part of a discussion I had with Sven Lidin. I've given my opinion on this, though it's a topic that should be discussed more generally by the Dictionary Working Group.</ins></div></td></tr>
</table>BrianMcMahonhttps://dictionary.iucr.org/index.php?title=Talk:Report_of_Working_Group&diff=1702&oldid=prevBrianMcMahon at 13:07, 13 March 20062006-03-13T13:07:12Z<p></p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>''Brian McMahon'' - In the section on ''Granularity'', I added the sentence "At the time of writing, categories are being assigned to entries on an ''ad hoc'' basis in an attempt to determine suitable structuring mechanisms", which I think fairly reflects where we are on this. Is it mandatory that every entry be assigned to one or more categories? (At the moment I haven't assigned a Category to my entries such as [[CIF]] because it's not clear what would be suitable in these specialised cases.) I observed also John Helliwell's uncertainty over assignement of categories. It may be helpful for Andre to draw up a more extensive list of candidate categories at a quite early stage.</div>BrianMcMahon