Difference between revisions of "Mesh"
From Online Dictionary of Crystallography
(modification after discussion with B. Souvignier) |
BrianMcMahon (talk | contribs) (Added German and Spanish translations (U. Mueller)) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | <font color="red">Masche</font> (''Ge''). <font color="green">Trama</font> (''Sp''). | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
The term '''mesh''' is commonly used with two meanings: | The term '''mesh''' is commonly used with two meanings: | ||
*In a two-dimensional pattern possessing rotational symmetry, the [[Symmetry element|rotation points]] constitute the nodes of a net and divide the plane into regions that are called ''meshes''. The number of meshes meeting at any rotation point equals twice the order of the rotation at that point. | *In a two-dimensional pattern possessing rotational symmetry, the [[Symmetry element|rotation points]] constitute the nodes of a net and divide the plane into regions that are called ''meshes''. The number of meshes meeting at any rotation point equals twice the order of the rotation at that point. | ||
| Line 4: | Line 7: | ||
According to Loeb (1971), only the first use would be correct. | According to Loeb (1971), only the first use would be correct. | ||
| + | |||
== Reference == | == Reference == | ||
| − | Loeb, A.B. (1971). Color and symmetry. Wiley. | + | *Loeb, A. B. (1971). ''Color and symmetry.'' New York: Wiley-Interscience. |
[[Category:Fundamental crystallography]] | [[Category:Fundamental crystallography]] | ||
Latest revision as of 12:51, 16 November 2017
Masche (Ge). Trama (Sp).
The term mesh is commonly used with two meanings:
- In a two-dimensional pattern possessing rotational symmetry, the rotation points constitute the nodes of a net and divide the plane into regions that are called meshes. The number of meshes meeting at any rotation point equals twice the order of the rotation at that point.
- A two-dimensional unit cell is also sometimes called a mesh.
According to Loeb (1971), only the first use would be correct.
Reference
- Loeb, A. B. (1971). Color and symmetry. New York: Wiley-Interscience.